infineon4engi@twitter infineon4engineers infineon@linkedin infineon@youtube
twitter Facebook Linkedin Youtube

Banner_Gate_Driver Banner_Isolated_GateDriver Banner_SOI_Gate_Driver Banner_Low_Side_Gate_Driver Banner_Solutions_for_Gate_Driver_and_power_switches


+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: IR2113 For VFD use, one driver keeps failing

  1. #1
    New Member New Member rwallicekruger is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    5
    Points
    45

    IR2113 For VFD use, one driver keeps failing

    Good day,

    I am trying to use three IR2113 drivers for a VFD. I have followed the application guide as attached. I am using six STF13N95K3 n-channel MOSFETs whose datasheet is also attached.
    Upon inspection of why the drive outputs an unbalanced voltage I found the output of the third driver was giving a constant high output for Ho and a constant low output for Lo.
    The bootstrap capacitor furthermore also seemed to not fully charge and Vb-Vs was at 5.66 V whereas the others were at 15.2 V. I replaced that driver and both the two MOSFETs it was connected to and all seemed fine until it happened again.

    My switching frequency is 25.6 kHz, using a sine-wave PWM scheme. The bootstrap capacitor calculation yielded 100 nF but it seems it might not be big enough as some of the pulses seems to switch off and then back on rapidly as though the capacitor was depleted.
    What could I look at specifically to try and mitigate the problem as why one driver stops functioning and yet the others do not? I tried using a 450 nF bootstrap on all three drivers and it did not revive the one driver.

    Kind regards
    Ruan Kruger
    float_drive.pdf
    stp13n95k3.pdf

  2. #2
    New Member New Member
    Infineon Employee
    Infineon Employee
    Elisabeth P. is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    Munich
    Posts
    1
    Points
    20

    Debugging of asymmetric driver performance in variable speed drives

    Hey Ruan,
    thanks for that very interesting question!
    Due to the fact that 2 out of three drivers are working as expected, I would say this is more an application problem.
    Therefore it would be good to double check you application layout.

    Here are some of my recommandations:
    1. Is there any difference in position of the driver block? (like further away from switch or load than the others?)
    2. Is there a difference in routing of the gate driver block? E.g. are there other functional blocks close, which are not there at the other?
    3. Is wiring difference from the control signal the same as with the other 2 drivers? Make sure there is no delay of input signal to this third driver.

    For further consulting I would need more information on the circuit layout e.g. a picture of the board and/or the oscilloscope pictures you are describing.

    Hope that helped for the beginning!
    Best regards,
    Elisabeth
    Last edited by Elisabeth P.; Jan 20th, 2020 at 05:02 AM.
    The views expressed here are my personal opinions, have not been reviewed or authorized by Infineon and do not necessarily represent the views of Infineon.

  3. #3
    New Member New Member rwallicekruger is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    5
    Points
    45
    Hi Elisabeth,

    I appreciate the advise. I have ordered a new PCB with a better layout, with more optimised routing of all the signal blocks. I hope this problem does not creep up again.
    The old design had longer routing on the third block both on the logic side and the output driver side. If the problem persists on the new design, I would reach back with oscilloscope graphs and the new circuit layout.

    Kind regards
    Ruan Kruger

  4. #4
    Beginner Beginner sujoy is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    13
    Points
    51.25
    Hi Ryan, Is your problem solved?

  5. #5
    New Member New Member rwallicekruger is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    5
    Points
    45
    Hi Sujoy

    I have not tested the new PCB with the new layout. At this point in time if anything fails it is going to be too late.

  6. #6
    Beginner Beginner sujoy is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    13
    Points
    51.25
    The reason I asked is that I have a similar issue with IRF2007 for a BLDC application. BTW have you tried ditching the sinusiodal PWM and driving the motor with square waves? Just an Idea

  7. #7
    New Member New Member rwallicekruger is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    5
    Points
    45
    I believe my problem helms from a poor layout and wrongfully calculated bootstrap capacitor sizing. My application requires a synthesized sine-wave unfortunately.

  8. #8
    Beginner Beginner sujoy is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    13
    Points
    51.25
    Maybe I didn't explain it properly. You should first see if the system works with a low frequency Square wave PWM at rated load. Sinusiodal waves increase the switching losses and can generate high DV/DT pulses for the motors. I hope your motor wire is shorter than 5-10 ft. Above 20ft you'll need an output choke.

  9. #9
    New Member New Member rwallicekruger is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Posts
    5
    Points
    45
    Good day, this thread can be closed. My problem has been resolved with the new layout.

  10. #10

    Infineon Employee
    Infineon Employee
    Expert
    electricuwe is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    28
    Hi Ruan,

    my recommendation is to look for another power device first. The body diode of HV Si-Mosfets generally has very poor reverse recovery behaviour. But his is mandatory for any application where an inductive current is to be commutated. Change to fast IGBT with a co-packaged diode or an SiC-Mosfet.


    Best regards,


    electricuwe
    The views expressed here are my personal opinions, have not been reviewed or authorized by Infineon and do not necessarily represent the views of Infineon.

+ Reply to Thread
Disclaimer

All content and materials on this site are provided “as is“. Infineon makes no warranties or representations with regard to this content and these materials of any kind, whether express or implied, including without limitation, warranties or representations of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, whether express or implied, is granted by Infineon. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from Infineon.


Infineon accepts no liability for the content and materials on this site being accurate, complete or up- to-date or for the contents of external links. Infineon distances itself expressly from the contents of the linked pages, over the structure of which Infineon has no control.


Content on this site may contain or be subject to specific guidelines or limitations on use. All postings and use of the content on this site are subject to the Usage Terms of the site; third parties using this content agree to abide by any limitations or guidelines and to comply with the Usage Terms of this site. Infineon reserves the right to make corrections, deletions, modifications, enhancements, improvements and other changes to the content and materials, its products, programs and services at any time or to move or discontinue any content, products, programs, or services without notice.