Not applicable
Aug 20, 2019
09:45 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Aug 20, 2019
09:45 PM
Hi All!
In my project, we are looking into to integrate Infineons SafeTLib on a TC234L, but before that we are trying to do some investigations(before we get the source code).
I wonder if someone have integrated it and could answer some questions:
How much CPU load does SafeTLib utilize?
How much RAM and FLASH is needed?
And finally, do you have any general hints that can make our integration smoother?
Regards
Mattias
In my project, we are looking into to integrate Infineons SafeTLib on a TC234L, but before that we are trying to do some investigations(before we get the source code).
I wonder if someone have integrated it and could answer some questions:
How much CPU load does SafeTLib utilize?
How much RAM and FLASH is needed?
And finally, do you have any general hints that can make our integration smoother?
Regards
Mattias
2 Replies
Nov 29, 2019
06:52 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Nov 29, 2019
06:52 AM
Have you gotten some answer to your question as I have the same for my project ?
Also SafeTlib, did you acquire the code base from infineon just like iLLD drivers ?
Also SafeTlib, did you acquire the code base from infineon just like iLLD drivers ?
Not applicable
Dec 01, 2019
11:03 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Dec 01, 2019
11:03 PM
Hi!
After some tryouts of the lib the data shows that the runtime CPU Load increased around 0.5%, as most of the tests are executed during startup.
The biggest challenge is to make all the tests pass, as the library itself seems, at least to me, quite unstable and non-deterministic.
And also that to get the SMU into RUN state after the Safelib have been executed, even if all tests has passed.
After some tryouts of the lib the data shows that the runtime CPU Load increased around 0.5%, as most of the tests are executed during startup.
The biggest challenge is to make all the tests pass, as the library itself seems, at least to me, quite unstable and non-deterministic.
And also that to get the SMU into RUN state after the Safelib have been executed, even if all tests has passed.