AURIX™ Forum Discussions

IFX_INTERRUPT(OS_CAT2_General_Handler,0,6);
IFX_INTERRUPT(OS_CAT2_General_Handler,0,5);

why i can't install same handler in different priority. It's logically can do as ARM architecture as the processor only use the priority to get the Handler start, i need a solution for installing the same handler (ISR) in different priorities to handle CAT2 interrupts in my project and i can't upload the project as i have a signed NDA.

The current TC397_TFT v1.0 development board uses the TC397 A step of the chip, but I see ADS are TC397 B step routines, I will ADS in a few examples compiled and burned to the development version, can not run normally, respectively, through the TASKING and winIDE DEBUG found that the chip startup process will enter the Context Maneger Error Trap, the following figure belongs to, please ask! Please ask:

1. For Context Maneger Error Trap should be solved in what way?

1. Current ADS 1.9.20 supports TC397 A step chip, if not support and TC397A step corresponding to the example tutorial?

2. What is the difference between TC397 A step and TC397 B step?

TASKING DEBUG

winIDE

smartconx_target@Q!w2e3r4t5y6u7i8o9p0||/t5/AURIX/TC397-TFT-v1-0%E5%BC%80%E5%8F%91%E6%9D%BF%E7%BC%96%E8%AF%91%E7%83%A7%E5%BD%95%E4%BB%BB%E6%84%8FADS%E7%A8%8B%E5%BA%8F%E4%BC%9A%E8%BF%9BContext-Maneger-Error-Trap/td-p/743094

This Q&A just discussed P/D Flash, AURIX™ MCU: Error Correction Code (ECC) support - KBA238244

My question: is there special ECC for  RAM and CAN relevant memory, e.g. Message RAM

Hi community.

I would like to ask you if it is possible to trigger a single EVADC channel through 2 trigger events of TOM. In detail, i would like to generate a PWM signal by means of TOM in up-down counting mode. The aim is to trigger the EVADC when the CN0 counter reaches CM0 value and when it reaches 0. In my case, the CN0 counter is reset by means of an external signal(TIM_EXT_CAPTURE), so i would like to ask you some advice for this task.

I am using Application Kit TC3X7 V2.0 TFT board

I have configured BMHD but  the board all the time boots from Internal flash ignoring BMHD settings

If i want to use Alternate Boot Mode or BMI  to boot , which all changes i need to do on the board?

Hello Infineon Team,

I am using TC377_ED_EX AURIX Tricore microcontroller, I have integrated RTOS code with my general configurations, code was built successfully in Tricore IDE, however after flashing code in Lauterbach T32 debugger, and doing step over at every function and getting trap at __mtcr().

If code is in trap, then in some trap registers it should show status in trap registers, but in Trap registers also there is no specific value only 0000000 given.

for better understanding, I am attaching screenshots of call stack, error window, & registers value log

Hope you will provide me better solution to overcome this issue.

Thanks,

Poonam

Hello,

I'm working on a project for a company where I need to implement Ethernet with UDP using Lwip. I noticed that there is no example on this particular subject. I only found examples of TCP echo. Nevertheless, I am attempting to write my own code for implementing a UDP server (code shown below). Then, I implement the function(udpServer_Init) in the main_cpu0 program. When I try to run the program, I can ping the microcontroller, but when I attempt to connect via Putty terminal, it says "connection refused." I am wondering if I am missing some settings in lwipopts.h or if I am overlooking something else. I would greatly appreciate it if anybody could provide me with some examples of UDP on the Aurix microcontroller or provide any help regarding this problem. I am also including important program files in the attachment.

We are using Tasking IDE on Aurix evaluation board. There’s a build in miniWiggler debugger. We can use this miniWiggler debugger to debug the code. We can set break points, stop at break points, evaluate variables at break points. However, one main feature is not working in all the PCs: we cannot do “step into”, “single step”, “step through” features. We must unset the break point in the current step and set a break point in the next step then hit “continue to run” to mimic the “single step” feature. Is that the problem with the debugger? Do j-link debugger work with Tasking IDE?

Thank you so much for your answer.